Legal Opinion

Coughtry v. . Globe Woolen Co.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 24, 1874PublishedCited by 115 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiff was nonsuited at the trial upon two grounds: First, that no action lay against the defendant in favor of the plaintiff for the alleged injury; and, secondly, that there was not sufficient evidence of negligence to justify the submission of that question to the jury.

At General Term the court were of opinion that there was sufficient evidence of negligence to have required the submission of the case to the jury, if the action lay. But the nonsuit was sustained on the ground that the defendant owed no duty to the plaintiff's intestate in respect to the construction of the scaffold,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Loop v. . LitchfieldNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
  2. Losee v. . CluteNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  3. Cook v. President of the New York Floating Dry Dock Co.New York Court of Common Pleas · 1857

3Cited by115 opinions

  1. Suvada v. White Motor Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Morningstar v. Black & Decker Manufacturing Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Devlin v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  4. Huset v. J. I. Case Threshing Mach. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903
  5. Benzing v. . Steinway and SonsNew York Court of Appeals · 1886

110 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API