Legal Opinion

Matter of Tillman

New York Court of Appeals

Decided April 26, 1932PublishedCited by 121 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Brien, J.

By written agreement James A. Tillman retained Borris M. Komar as his attorney to prosecute claims against several foreign insurance corporations. The attorney’s compensation was to be three per cent of the proceeds but in the event that the litigation should result in no proceeds, the attorney was to receive nothing. After the client’s right to recover had been established and the litigation was terminated except for computation by a referee of the amounts due, serious differences arose between the attorney and the client. On petition by the client, the courts below have ordered a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Johnson v. Board of SupervisorsNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  2. Randall v. . PackardNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  3. Matter of KrooksNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  4. Adams v. . the Fort Plain BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1867
  5. Starin v. . Mayor, Etc., of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1887

3Cited by121 opinions

  1. Lai Ling Cheng v. Modansky Leasing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. Rosenberg v. LevinSupreme Court of Florida · 1982
  3. In Re Estate of CallahanIllinois Supreme Court · 1991
  4. In Re the Estate of MontgomeryNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
  5. Melat, Pressman & Higbie, L.L.P. v. Hannon Law Firm, L.L.C.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2012

116 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API