Legal Opinion

State v. Hubacek

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 1, 1992No. 2-91-184-CRPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PARRIS, Justice.

Roger William Hubacek was charged with driving while intoxicated after his arrest at a police roadblock. Hubacek moved to suppress the evidence concerning the arrest, contending it was obtained without probable cause and by subterfuge. The trial court disregarded Hubacek’s arguments, but sustained his motion holding the roadblock was unlawful because its sole purpose was not a check for driver’s licenses.

On appeal, the State contends the trial court erred in holding the roadblock could not be conducted for dual purposes. In response, Hubacek argues the trial court’s…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Brown v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Michigan Department of State Police v. SitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. McCullough v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  4. Webb v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
  5. Padgett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. HoltCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1993
  2. Gerardo Lujan v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2009
  3. Gerardo Lujan v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API