Legal Opinion
Holt v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Decided June 15, 1994No. 599-93PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*17 OPINION ON APPELLEE’S PETITION FOB DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
MILLER, Judge.
Appellee was charged with driving while intoxicated (“DWI”) after she was arrested at a sobriety checkpoint set up by the Arlington Police Department. Appellee filed a motion to suppress evidence seized through the sobriety checkpoint, alleging that the checkpoint violated her rights under the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution as well as Article I, Section 9 of the Texas Constitution. Specifically, appellee claimed that the lack of a legislatively-authorized, statewide administrative scheme makes sobriety…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Brown v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. Martinez-FuerteSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Michigan Department of State Police v. SitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Sims v. Collection Division of the Utah State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. BarkerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1993
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Mullinax v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
- Schenekl v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
- State v. SkilesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- People v. LidsterAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001
- Sheridan v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.