State v. Holt
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FARRIS, Justice.
Regina H. Holt was charged with driving while intoxicated after her arrest at a sobriety checkpoint. The trial court sustained Holt’s motion to suppress the evidence concerning her arrest, holding the sobriety checkpoint was unconstitutional under both the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution and article I, section 9, of the Texas Constitution.
On appeal, the State contends the trial court erred in holding the constitutionality of a checkpoint depends not only on the Brown test, but also on a threshold finding that the checkpoint was adminis*49tered in…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Brown v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Michigan Department of State Police v. SitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Get Away Club, Inc. v. Vic Coleman, Jim SnyderCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
- Crail v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
- State v. Wagner, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1992
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Holt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
- Holt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
- Holt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
- State v. SanchezCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
- State v. SanchezCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993