Legal Opinion

Bertie Mae Rhoton v. Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided September 22, 1983No. 82-5245PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELLFORD, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff-appellant appeals the decision of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee denying her relief in an action for survivor’s benefits against the defendant-appellee Pension Fund. Jurisdiction is founded upon the Employee Retirement and Income Security Act (ERISA), 29 USC § 1132(a)(1)(B).

At issue is whether the denial of the benefits sought was arbitrary, capricious, or in bad faith. Van Gunten v. Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund, 672 F.2d 586 (6th Cir.1982). Because the Fund trustees have given an…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Horace Eugene Bayles v. Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension FundCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
  2. Claude I. Van Gunten v. Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension FundCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Hugh Edwards v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
  2. June G. Moore v. Reynolds Metals Company Retirement Program for Salaried EmployeesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
  3. Ronald Adcock, Cross v. The Firestone Tire and Rubber Company, CrossCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
  4. UNC Teton Exploration Drilling, Inc. v. PeytonWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Richard P. Helwig v. Kelsey-Hayes CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API