Legal Opinion
Claude I. Van Gunten v. Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided March 19, 1982No. 80-3597PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Per curiam
Appellant Claude Van Gunten, denied pension benefits by the trustees of the Teamsters Union Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund, brought this action under section 502 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, 29 U.S.C. § 1132, for a declaration *587of his pension rights and an award of benefits. The case was submitted on a stipulation of facts and issues. He appeals the District Court’s decision that the trustees did not act arbitrarily or capriciously in denying his claim to pension benefits. We agree with the District Court’s conclusion and affirm its…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- James J. Reiherzer v. Daniel J. Shannon, and Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension FundCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978
- Ellis Maness v. Roy L. Williams and Herman A. Lueking, Jr., as Trustees of the Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension FundCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
3Cited by23 opinions
- David E. Blakeman and Harold D. Keeble v. Mead ContainersCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
- June G. Moore v. Reynolds Metals Company Retirement Program for Salaried EmployeesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
- Varhola v. DoeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
- Teamster's Local 348 Health and Welfare Fund v. Kohn Beverage CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
- Bertie Mae Rhoton v. Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension FundCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.