Legal Opinion

Haase v. DePree

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided May 24, 1966No. Docket 456PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolbrook, P. J.

This is an action for malpractice brought against defendant, a medical physician and surgeon. The plaintiff filed an amended count 2 to which defendant filed a motion for summary judgment. The trial judge granted the summary judgment and from the order dismissing count 2 of the complaint, plaintiff appeals. The facts are undisputed and appear to be as follows:

Plaintiff’s amended count 2 claims damages for alleged malpractice. She claims that as a result of a thoracic aortogram performed by defendant that she lost circulation in her right arm and hand, which required its amputation just above…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Mitcham v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Salgo v. Leland Stanford Jr. University Board of TrusteesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  3. Felgner v. AndersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Lince v. MonsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Zoterell v. ReppMichigan Supreme Court · 1915

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Joos v. Auto-Owners InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Stanek v. BergeonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. Powers v. HuizingMichigan Court of Appeals · 1967
  4. Belobradich v. SarnsethsiriMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Martinez v. Redford Community HospitalMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API