Legal Opinion

Stanek v. Bergeon

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided February 22, 1979No. Docket 77-3641PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff, William Stanek, filed a complaint against defendant Milton Bergeon seeking damages for medical malpractice. Plaintiff also sought damages from defendant Mason General Hospital on an agency theory. Plaintiff appeals the jury verdict of no cause of action as to each defendant.

On appeal plaintiff raises several issues. In his discussion of five of the nine issues raised plaintiff cites no authority. Such a practice has been held sufficient to preclude appellate review. Kucken v Hygrade Food Products Corp, 51 Mich App 471; 215 NW2d 772 (1974).

We find no clear abuse of discretion in the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Siirila v. BarriosMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Lince v. MonsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Simonelli v. CassidyMichigan Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Kucken v. Hygrade Food Products Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1974
  5. Klein v. WagenheimMichigan Supreme Court · 1967

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Pelc v. Bendix MacHine Tool Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Sowels v. LABORERS'INTERNATIONAL UNION OF NAMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. People v. SlagerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. Waatti v. Marquette General Hospital, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. Ellison v. Wayne County General HospitalMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API