Legal Opinion

Martinez v. Redford Community Hospital

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided January 7, 1986No. Docket 79312PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiffs appeal as of right from an order of the circuit court granting defendants’ motion to strike plaintiffs’ amended complaint and dismiss their medical malpractice case. GCR 1963, 115, now MCR 2.15. We affirm and hold that the degree of specificity required in pleading a medical malpractice action flows from the circumstances and nature of the case rather than from any objective heavier burden of pleading imposed on medical malpractice actions.

Plaintiffs filed a medical malpractice complaint against defendants on February 19, 1984. Defendants subsequently moved for a more definite…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Simonelli v. CassidyMichigan Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Roulo v. Automobile Club of Mich.Michigan Supreme Court · 1971
  3. O'TOOLE v. FortinoMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. Creen v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Schindler v. Milwaukee, Lake Shore & Western Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1889

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Kincaid v. CardwellMichigan Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. Kahn v. BurmanDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1987
  3. Porter v. Henry Ford HospitalMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. Dacon v. TransueMichigan Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Dacon v. TransueMichigan Supreme Court · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API