Colley v. Sapp
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Tulsa County; Action by Edward Sapp and Hiram W. Curry against William E. Colley. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
THACKER, C.
Plaintiff in, error will be designated as defendant and defendants in error as plaintiffs, in accord with their respective titles in the trial court.
An issue of fact was made in' this case by petition for the recovery of an alleged balance unpaid on a charge for services rendered by plaintiffs as attorneys at law on a written contract, by the terms of which they were to receive the fair and reasonable value of their services as compensation, and an answer thereto, consisting merely of an unverified general denial. The petition alleges that, as duly licensed attorneys at…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- San Diego Land & Town Co. v. NealeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Spencer v. CollinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Flesher v. CallahanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Owen v. United States Surety Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Southern Pac. Co. v. EarlCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1897
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Hempstead v. Meadville Theological SchoolSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
- Owens v. Oklahoma Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
- Clark v. Continental Tank Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
- Oklahoma Tax Commission v. RicksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
- Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. GilmoreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.