Legal Opinion

Clark v. Continental Tank Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 20, 1987No. 62720PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SUMMERS, Justice.

By this decision we hold that the Oklahoma Evidence Code did not change the long-standing rule that gave a trial court discretion as to whether an expert witness may be excepted from the rule requiring sequestration of witnesses. Upon review of other allegations of error as well, we affirm.

FACTS AND HISTORY

While working in the oil fields plaintiff was severely burned by a flash fire occurring while he was manually draining a piece of production equipment known as a heater/treater. He sued the defendant/manufacturer in products liability, claiming defective design and failure…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Geders v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Fields v. Volkswagen of America, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
  3. Messler v. Simmons Gun Specialties, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
  4. Smith v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
  5. Elizabeth River Tunnel District v. BeecherSupreme Court of Virginia · 1961

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. MossSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
  2. Bostick Tank Truck Service v. NixSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
  3. Dennis Holt and Tonya Holt, Husband and Wife v. Deere & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
  4. Prince v. BF Ascher Company, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2004
  5. Marshall v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1998

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API