Clark v. Continental Tank Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
SUMMERS, Justice.
By this decision we hold that the Oklahoma Evidence Code did not change the long-standing rule that gave a trial court discretion as to whether an expert witness may be excepted from the rule requiring sequestration of witnesses. Upon review of other allegations of error as well, we affirm.
FACTS AND HISTORY
While working in the oil fields plaintiff was severely burned by a flash fire occurring while he was manually draining a piece of production equipment known as a heater/treater. He sued the defendant/manufacturer in products liability, claiming defective design and failure…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Geders v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Fields v. Volkswagen of America, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
- Messler v. Simmons Gun Specialties, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- Smith v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
- Elizabeth River Tunnel District v. BeecherSupreme Court of Virginia · 1961
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. MossSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
- Bostick Tank Truck Service v. NixSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
- Dennis Holt and Tonya Holt, Husband and Wife v. Deere & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- Prince v. BF Ascher Company, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2004
- Marshall v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1998
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.