Legal Opinion

DeCesare v. Lembert

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 20, 1983No. Civ. No. 6038PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ANDREEN, J.

This is an appeal from an order imposing sanctions and costs against plaintiff and her attorney following the granting of a motion that the case be dropped from the calendar. We reverse with directions.

Facts

Plaintiff filed a medical malpractice action against defendant Dr. Lembert. The trial was set for June 30, 1980, in Fresno. At the mandatory settlement *22conference, plaintiff’s counsel asked for a continuance because of a conflict with a trial in Pasadena. Judge Pettitt, who was conducting the settlement conference, responded that he could not entertain an oral motion and…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. D'AMICO v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Serrano v. PriestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Bauguess v. PaineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Pike v. ZadigCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  5. McFaddin v. H. S. Crocker Co.California Court of Appeal · 1963

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Levine v. PollackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  2. Guzman v. General Motors Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API