Connell v. Newkirk-George Motor Co.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Certiorari; from Fulton superior court — Judge Pendleton. May 19, 1921.
1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.
It is immaterial wlietlier the plaintiff in the court below was, as contended by it, a bona fide purchaser for value of the negotiable purchase-money instrument sued on, or whether, as contended by the defendant, the plaintiff was in fact the real seller of the car, since the written contract, under which the sale was made, expressly provided that the “ vendor does not warrant said property, and makes no representations concerning same, except that title to same is in vendor and free from incumbrances;” and consequently the defendant was not entitled to contradict the written terms of the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Harrell v. HolmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
- Snellgrove v. DingelhoefCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1920
- Payne v. Chal-Max Motor Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1920
- Butler v. Citizens BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1922
- Stamps v. Dawson Bros. Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Widincamp v. PattersonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
- Alford v. RowellNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1940
- Washington & Lincolnton Railroad v. Southern Iron & Equipment Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1922
- Colson & Sons v. EllisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
- Frick Co. v. LawsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.