Legal Opinion

Payne v. Chal-Max Motor Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 5, 1920No. 11594PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Attachment; from city court of Albany — Judge Clayton Jones. May 11, 1920.

1Opinion of the CourtBloodworth, J.

1. Mrs. Lois Payne bought an automobile, signed a contract of purchase, and gave a series of notes. On default of the payment of a portion of the notes an attachment for the balance of the purchase-price was issued and levied, and a declaration was filed. Pleas ^tting up that the automobile was defective and not suited to the purpose intended were amended so as to show that the defendant elected “to rely on the state*678ments in her answer of implied warranty” only. The contract contained the following: “The vendor does not warrant said property except that the title to same is in the vendor and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Harrell v. HolmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
  2. Flagg v. HitchcockSupreme Court of Georgia · 1915
  3. Mansor v. ZemurrayCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1918
  4. McDonald v. RimesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hardy v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1928
  2. Connell v. Newkirk-George Motor Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1922
  3. Frick Co. v. LawsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
  4. Harper v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
  5. Wilson v. EargleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1958

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API