Payne v. Chal-Max Motor Co.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Attachment; from city court of Albany — Judge Clayton Jones. May 11, 1920.
1Opinion of the CourtBloodworth, J.
1. Mrs. Lois Payne bought an automobile, signed a contract of purchase, and gave a series of notes. On default of the payment of a portion of the notes an attachment for the balance of the purchase-price was issued and levied, and a declaration was filed. Pleas ^tting up that the automobile was defective and not suited to the purpose intended were amended so as to show that the defendant elected “to rely on the state*678ments in her answer of implied warranty” only. The contract contained the following: “The vendor does not warrant said property except that the title to same is in the vendor and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Harrell v. HolmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
- Flagg v. HitchcockSupreme Court of Georgia · 1915
- Mansor v. ZemurrayCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1918
- McDonald v. RimesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
3Cited by9 opinions
- Hardy v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1928
- Connell v. Newkirk-George Motor Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1922
- Frick Co. v. LawsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
- Harper v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
- Wilson v. EargleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1958
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.