Legal Opinion

Alford v. Rowell

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided May 27, 1940No. 4474PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SADLER, Justice.

Plaintiff (appellee) sued defendants to recover the balance remaining due after sale of certain repossessed personal property ■ consisting of a refrigerator display counter, a meat block and other miscellaneous items. Default by defendants in the payment of monthly installments called for by the conditional sales contract evidencing the transaction was averred and the balance due, including attorneys fees and expenses incident to the sale, was alleged to be $365.83, for which sum judgment was prayed. A copy of the conditional sales contract was attached to the complaint.

The…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Seitz v. Brewers' Refrigerating MacHine Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Telman v. GallesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Armington v. StelleMontana Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Hill & MacMillan, Inc. v. TaylorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  5. Adams v. BlumenshineNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1922

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Sierra Blanca Sales Co., Inc. v. Newco Industries, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1972
  2. Wilburn v. StewartNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Bell v. LammonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Hoge v. Farmers Market & Supply Co. of Las Cruces, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Jernigan v. New Amsterdam Casualty CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API