Legal Opinion

Butler v. Citizens Bank

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 10, 1922No. 12383PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Complaint; from city court of Douglas — Judge Henson. February 23, 1921.

1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.

1. A written instrument which upon its face is apparently a completely executed contract between the parties may nevertheless, by the circumstances attending its execution, and the understanding between the parties, be shown not to be a valid contract until the performance of some other act of one of the parties as a condition precedent to the instrument’s becoming a binding contract between them. Pidcock v. Crouch, 7 Ga. App. 299 (66 S. E. 973); Heitmann v. Commercial Bank, 6 Ga. App. 584 (65 S. E. 590). Where a promissory note is executed by a person ostensibly as the principal, and is…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Heitmann v. Commercial BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
  2. Pidcock v. Crouch & SonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1910
  3. Thomas & McCafferty v. SieselCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  4. McNeel v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  5. Cochran v. Jones & OglesbyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1912

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Colson & Sons v. EllisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
  2. Connell v. Newkirk-George Motor Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1922
  3. Palmer-Murphey Co. v. BarnettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
  4. Gross v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
  5. Veal v. WeatherlyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API