Butler v. Citizens Bank
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Complaint; from city court of Douglas — Judge Henson. February 23, 1921.
1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.
1. A written instrument which upon its face is apparently a completely executed contract between the parties may nevertheless, by the circumstances attending its execution, and the understanding between the parties, be shown not to be a valid contract until the performance of some other act of one of the parties as a condition precedent to the instrument’s becoming a binding contract between them. Pidcock v. Crouch, 7 Ga. App. 299 (66 S. E. 973); Heitmann v. Commercial Bank, 6 Ga. App. 584 (65 S. E. 590). Where a promissory note is executed by a person ostensibly as the principal, and is…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Heitmann v. Commercial BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
- Pidcock v. Crouch & SonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1910
- Thomas & McCafferty v. SieselCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
- McNeel v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
- Cochran v. Jones & OglesbyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1912
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Colson & Sons v. EllisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
- Connell v. Newkirk-George Motor Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1922
- Palmer-Murphey Co. v. BarnettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
- Gross v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
- Veal v. WeatherlyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1942