Estate of Akin v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NETTESHEIM, Judge.
This case comes before the court after argument on defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction pursuant to RCFC 12(b)(1). The first issue presented is whether plaintiffs have violated the “full payment” rule, thereby depriving the court of jurisdiction to entertain their tax refund suit. Plaintiffs argue that they complied with the full payment requirement because, prior to the filing of the complaint in this case, they entered into a settlement agreement with the IRS that purportedly negated any outstanding tax liability for the taxable year at issue. The…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Federal Crop Ins. Corp. v. MerrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Land v. DollarSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Office of Personnel Management v. RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Buser v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- International Paper Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1996
- Pevar Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1995
- Intersport Fashions West, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
- Chaney v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.