Legal Opinion
Pevar Co. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided March 7, 1995No. 94-465CPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
MOODY R. TIDWELL, III, Judge:
This case is before the court on defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to RCFC 12(b)(1). Because plaintiff failed to comply with the jurisdictional prerequisites of the Contract Disputes Act of 1978, 41 U.S.C. §§ 601-613 (1988 & Supp. V 1993) (CDA), the court grants defendant’s motion.
FACTS
On February 15, 1991, plaintiff, the Pevar Company, entered into contract FO603-91-C8208 with defendant, the Department of the Air Force. Plaintiff agreed to design and construct a new building, called Zero Bay, at the Dover Air…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Land v. DollarSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Contract Cleaning Maintenance, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Transamerica Insurance Corporation, Inc., for and on Behalf of Stroup Sheet Metal Works v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Medina Construction, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
- UMC Electronics Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
- Scan-Tech Security, L.P. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
- J & E Salvage Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
- Kentucky Bridge & Dam, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.