Legal Opinion

Intersport Fashions West, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided October 29, 2008No. 07-739 TPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

HEWITT, Judge.

Before the court are defendant’s Motion of the United States to Dismiss in Part (defendant’s Motion or Def.’s Mot.), plaintiffs Response to Motion of the United States to Dismiss in Part (plaintiffs Response or Pl.’s Resp.), plaintiffs Memorandum of the Plaintiff in Support of its Motion to Deny United States Motion (plaintiffs Memorandum or Pl.’s Mem.), and defendant’s Reply of the United States in Support of its Motion to Dismiss in Part (defendant’s Reply or Def.’s Reply).

For the following reasons, defendant’s Motion is GRANTED.

I. Background

A. Procedural…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  2. McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  3. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
  5. United States v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Hufford v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
  2. Phang v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
  3. Mendez-Cardenas v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
  4. Brach v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
  5. Dynetics, Inc. and Subsidiaries v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API