Legal Opinion

Thomas v. Lavery

California Supreme Court

Decided June 23, 1932No. Docket No. L.A. 11544PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSeawell, J.

Defendant Jessie E. Lavery appeals from a judgment awarding plaintiff J. D. Thomas damages in the sum of $30,856 for breach of a contract executed on November 12, 1925, whereby he was given the exclusive right to sell fifty-seven lots in a subdivided tract in the city of Los Angeles owned by said Jessie E. Lavery. Plaintiff sued to recover for loss of future profits or commission which he alleged he would have earned from the sale of lots unsold on August 1, 1927, had he not been wrongfully prevented from selling said lots. Emma L. Barnett, a daughter of Mrs. Lavery to whom she conveyed the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Alderson v. HoustonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Katz v. BedfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Kales v. HoughtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Smith v. BlodgetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Yule v. MillerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Thomas v. LaveryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  2. Never v. KingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API