Legal Opinion

Yule v. Miller

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 11, 1927No. Docket No. 5298PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMPBELL, J., pro tem.

This appeal is from that portion of the judgment only which awards to respondents judgment on their cross-complaint, in the amount of $976.23, together with interest and costs, and not from the judgment entered in favor of appellant quieting title to certain lands and canceling certain instruments of conveyance.

On the fifteenth day of June, 1921, respondent Katie C. Miller entered into a written contract with appellant, W. A. C. Yule, for the purchase and sale of lots 2 and 11 in block 121 of Middletown, being 50 by 200 feet, number 3153, India Street, San Diego,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Peters v. PetersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Mercantile Trust Co. v. Sunset Road Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Gray v. BekinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Parsons v. EastonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Williams v. HawleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Powers v. Board of Public WorksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Campagna v. Market Street Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Atkins v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
  4. Forslund v. ForslundCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  5. Nelson v. Fernando Nelson & SonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API