Legal Opinion

Mickey v. Ayers

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 14, 1984No. 3118PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, Judge:

Appellants contend that the trial court committed reversible error in charging the jury on the “assured clear distance ahead” rule, 75 Pa.C.S.A. § 3361. Because we find appellants’ contention meritless, we affirm the lower court’s denial of appellants’ motion for new trial.

This case involves conflicting versions of a two-car, head-on collision that occurred on June 28, 1980, on Route 611, a winding road in Forks Township, Northampton County. Appellants, Mr. and Mrs. Mickey, allege that appellee, Mr. Ayers, driving north on the two-lane highway, went off the road to his right,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Junk v. East End Fire DepartmentSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. James v. FergusonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  3. Anderson v. HughesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  4. Harman Et Ux. v. ChambersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  5. Unangst v. WhitehouseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Hoy v. AngeloneSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  2. Chanthavong v. TranSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  3. Leaphart v. Whiting Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  4. Gallo v. Yamaha Motor Corp., USASupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Spearing v. StarcherSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API