Junk v. East End Fire Department
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
JACOBS, President.Judge:
This appeal comes to us following judgments entered in appellees’ favor on appellant’s complaint against appellees and on appellees’ counterclaim against appellant. Appellant raises nine issues for our consideration. We agree with appellant that the lower court erred in instructing the jury on appellees’ counterclaim. Therefore, we reverse the judgment on the counterclaim and remand that part of the case for a new trial. We find no reversible error concerning appellant’s complaint and, accordingly, affirm that part of the judgment.
Briefly stated the facts are as…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Kuisis v. Baldwin-Lima-Hamilton Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Whitner v. LojeskiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
- Byrne v. Schultz (Stone)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
- Reardon v. MeehanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
- Laubach v. HaighSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by75 opinions
- Pratt v. SteinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Bloom v. DuBois Regional Medical CenterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Del Turco v. Peoples Home Savings Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Feingold v. HillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Walasavage v. MarinelliSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.