Legal Opinion

Gallo v. Yamaha Motor Corp., USA

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 26, 1987No. 01244PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

M0NTEMUR0, Judge:

Appellant challenges the denial of its post-trial motions by the Northampton Court of Common Pleas. Because the trial court committed several errors of consequence, we reverse and remand for a new trial.

This case arises from a January 28, 1978 collision between an automobile and the snowmobile upon which appellee Concetta Gallo was riding as a passenger. Ms. Gallo filed an action against appellees Bruce Ott, driver of the snowmobile, Steven J. Polansky, driver of the automobile, and Yamaha Motor Corporation, U.S.A., manufacturer of the snowmobile. Yamaha joined appellants…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Singer v. SheppardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Craig v. Magee Memorial Rehabilitation CenterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. Jones v. Three Rivers Management Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. Rivera v. Philadelphia Theological Seminary of St. Charles Borromeo, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. Martin v. SoblotneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Ottavio v. Fibreboard Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  2. Rizzo v. MichenerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  3. Sweitzer v. Dempster SystemsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Benevento v. Life USA Holding, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1999
  5. Griesser v. National Railroad PassengerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API