Larson v. Larson
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtPeek, J.
By bis first cause of action plaintiff sought to quiet title to certain lands located in Mendocino County, and by his second cause sought to enjoin the maintenance of a certain fence alleged to have been erected by defendants and to require the removal thereof. Defendants’ answer admitted plaintiff’s ownership of the lands described in the complaint but denied the trespass or that the fence was upon plaintiff’s land. In addition defendants alleged they had erected the fence along an agreed boundary line with the full knowledge and acquiescence of plaintiff. The ease proceeded to trial on the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Cragin v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Weaver v. HowattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Phelps v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 1948
- Churchill Co. v. BealCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Schwartz v. DibbleeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. Paul E. Reimann, and Maybeth Farr Reimann, His WifeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1974
- Casad v. QuallsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Everett v. LantzSupreme Court of Colorado · 1952
- Ramirez v. MookiniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Schoenecke v. YostSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989