Legal Opinion
Casad v. Qualls
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 21, 1977No. Civ. 2973PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BROWN (G. A.), P. J.
This action involves a dispute regarding the ownership of certain real property in the rural area of Fresno County. The trial court decided that title is in the defendants and cross-complainants, Otis W. Qualls and Stella M. Qualls (hereinafter Qualls), predicated solely upon the res judicata effect of a judgment entered between the predecessors in interest of plaintiff and cross-defendant Helene A. Casad (hereinafter Casad) and of Qualls. The sole issue on appeal is whether the trial court erred in holding the prior judgment to have conclusive effect on the issues…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Cragin v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Newport v. HattonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Estate of DodgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Goddard v. Security Title Insurance & Guarantee Co.California Supreme Court · 1939
- Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. McConnellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Thibodeau v. CrumCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Jenkins v. County of RiversideCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Columbus Line, Inc. v. Gray Line Sight-Seeing Companies Associated, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1981
- Pleasant Valley Canal Co. v. BorrorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Silver v. Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation AuthorityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.