Legal Opinion

Schwartz v. Dibblee

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 17, 1921No. Civ. No. 3437PublishedCited by 2 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtConrey, P. J.

Appellant brought this action to recover possession and the issues and profits of lot 14, in section 33, township 29 south, range 12 east, M. D. M., in San Luis Obispo County, alleged to have been unlawfully withheld by .the defendants. Judgment was entered in favor of the defendants, and plaintiff appeals therefrom.

Appellant is the owner of an undivided three-quarters and defendant Arata is the owner of an undivided one-quarter of the land described in the complaint. They became such owners through mesne conveyances from an owner to whom the land was patented by the United States government…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kimball v. McKeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Commissioner of Highways v. BeebeMichigan Supreme Court · 1886

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wing v. WallaceIdaho Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Larson v. LarsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API