Legal Opinion

Phelps v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 4, 1948No. Civ. 7425PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeek, J.

The plaintiff and cross-defendants herein have appealed from a judgment in favor of the defendant and cross-complainant quieting title in the defendant to all of Section Twenty Seven (27), Township Twenty Three (23) North, Range Five (5) East, M. D. B. & M., in the county of Butte, State of California, as shown and delineated on the plat of the resurvey of said section approved by the General Land Office of the United States on March 17, 1941, subject only to an easement for highway purposes; and decreeing that plaintiffs take nothing by their action herein.

The plaintiffs as copartners doing…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Cox v. HartSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. Cragin v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  3. Wisconsin Central Railroad v. Price CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  4. Ayers v. WatsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  5. Horne v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1895

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Chandler v. HibberdCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  2. Bloxham v. SaldingerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  3. White v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  4. United States v. Paul E. Reimann, and Maybeth Farr Reimann, His WifeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1974
  5. Casad v. QuallsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API