Legal Opinion

Nelson v. Industrial Commission

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided June 5, 1975No. 1 CA-IC 1115PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WREN, Judge.

The issue presented on this review of an Industrial Commission award is whether petitioner’s Raynaud’s Disease was causally related to his employment. The Commission found it was not. We agree with that determination.

Petitioner, Melvin Nelson (Nelson), had worked as a mechanic for twenty-three years before starting work with Harkers Auto Repair (Harkers) on March 30, 1973. On April 27, 1973, Nelson punctured his right wrist during the course of his employment as a mechanic for Harkers. On May 2, Nelson saw Dr. Paul Allison, a general practitioner, who treated the wound…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Murray v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Valdon v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Caganich v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1972
  4. State Compensation Fund v. KeefeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1974
  5. Martin v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Perry v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Salt River Project v. Indus. Com'n of Ariz.Arizona Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Dugan v. American Express Travel Related Services Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
  4. Ramonett v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
  5. Makinson v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONACourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API