Legal Opinion

Valdon v. Industrial Commission

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided November 20, 1968No. 9206-PRPublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BERNSTEIN, Justice.

In July of 1963, the claimant, Seferino Valdon, was employed by the Maricopa County Highway Department and injured in the course of his employment. Under the employment practices in effect at that time, Maricopa County employees were permitted to continue their employment until age 70, although eligible for retirement at 65.

Valdon was officially classified as an “Equipment Operator”. However, he was in fact assigned to a crew which was painting highway traffic control stripes, and his duties included unloading cans of paint weighing up to 90 pounds per can from carload…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp. v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Tatman v. Provincial HomesArizona Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Paulley v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Aluminum Co. of America v. Industrial Commission of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Revles v. Industrial Commission of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1960

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Micucci v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Perry v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Kenton v. Hyatt Hotels Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1985
  4. Prigosin v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Rutledge v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1972

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API