Legal Opinion

People v. City of Los Angeles

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 7, 1923No. Civ. No. 4173PublishedCited by 18 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Leslie R. Hewitt, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court

1Opinion of the Court

In the main this is an appeal by the defendants from a judgment declaring void an ordinance adopted by the city council of the city of Los Angeles which ordered the vacation of that part of Argyle Avenue lying between Sunset Boulevard and Selma Avenue, a distance of 573.3 feet. This appeal further involves an order by the trial court denying defendants' motion to strike certain portions of the complaint, as well as to dismiss the complaint because improperly authorized by the attorney-general; also an appeal by the plaintiff from the order denying plaintiff's application for a preliminary…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Smith v. McDowellIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Wulzen v. Bd. of Supervisors of City & Cty of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  3. People v. Gold Run Ditch & Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Ligare v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Los Angeles Gas & Electric Co. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. City of Los Angeles v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Beals v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. City of Rancho Palos Verdes v. City CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  4. Brydon v. City of Hermosa BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  5. People v. City of San RafaelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API