Legal Opinion

M.H.B. Company v. Desmond

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 26, 1929No. 21712. Department OnePublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTolman, J.

Respondents, being the owners of certain real property in the city of Tacoma and having in contemplation the erection of a building thereon, early in the year 1926, entered into negotiations with the appellant Ray M. Leftwick which resulted in their adding a second story to their building at an increased cost of some $30,000, which was so constructed as to be suitable for use as a bowling alley. On May 26, 1926, a written lease, duly acknowledged, covering the second story of the building, was entered into by the parties, and the lessee Leftwick proceeded to erect and install bowling alleys…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Spencer v. Commercial Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Bush v. HavirdIdaho Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Culp v. McMehanWashington Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Donahue v. Hardman EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Bernard v. CrosbyWashington Supreme Court · 1922

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Russell v. Golden Rule Mining Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Kohout v. BrooksWashington Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Peyton Building, LLC v. Niko's Gourmet, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  4. Clear Channel Outdoor v. Seattle Popular Monorail AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  5. Peyton Building, LLC v. Nikos Gourmet Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API