Legal Opinion

Donahue v. Hardman Estate

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 9, 1916No. 13073PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Ronald, J., entered May 1, 1915, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, in an action to recover personal property, tried to the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

This action was brought for the purpose of recovering possession of certain personal property, or in lieu thereof its reasonable value. The property described in the *126complaint is one hundred and ninety-six window shades, seventeen fire extinguishers, thirteen fire gongs, one hundred and twenty-five towel hangers, two electric signs, thirty feet of brass railing, two Vienna chairs, one loose leaf ledger, one pair of andirons, one gas log, one hundred and twenty-four medicine cabinets, sixteen garbage cans, and brass nosing on stairs, which property was alleged to be of the value of $675.60.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ingham v. Harper & SonWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Bush v. HavirdIdaho Supreme Court · 1906

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Rinaldi v. GollerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Glaser v. North'sOregon Supreme Court · 1954
  3. United Pacific Insurance v. CannCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  4. Hill's Garage v. RiceWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  5. M.H.B. Company v. DesmondWashington Supreme Court · 1929

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API