Legal Opinion

Clear Channel Outdoor v. Seattle Popular Monorail Authority

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided January 22, 2007No. 57151-6-IPublished

1Opinion of the Court

*783¶1 Clear Channel Outdoor, owner of a billboard in Ballard, challenges the summary judgment dismissal of its claim of inverse condemnation against Seattle Popular Monorail Authority (Monorail). Because Clear Channel had no contractual right to any automatic extension or renewal of its lease agreement and occupied the property as a holdover tenant, the mere fact that Monorail took possession by a purchase and sale in lieu of condemnation does not give Clear Channel any additional rights in the leasehold. We affirm.

Grosse, J.

FACTS

¶2 As part of its acquisition of real estate along the projected…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Ruckelshaus v. Monsanto Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. Almota Farmers Elevator & Warehouse Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Tiffany Family Trust Corp. v. City of KentWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Spokane School District No. 81 v. ParzybokWashington Supreme Court · 1981

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API