Legal Opinion

Culp v. McMehan

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 10, 1923No. 17518PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.

Appellants, as assignees of Charles J. E. Blanc and wife, brought this action to foreclose a landlord’s lien on certain personal property formerly *500a part of the assets of the Chamber of Hygienics, tenants of the Blancs. The property was bought in by respondents upon a foreclosure of a chattel mortgage after the Chamber of Hygienics had gone into the hands of a receiver. Prom a judgment of dismissal upon the sustaining of a demurrer to the complaint, this appeal is taken.

The first question to be considered involves the meaning of § 1203-1 of Rem. Comp. Stat., which, in so far as it is material…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Peterson v. DillonWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  2. City Sash & Door Co. v. BunnWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Manhattan Trust Co. v. Seattle Coal & Iron Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Thomas v. Grote-Rankin Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Clark v. KilianWashington Supreme Court · 1921

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Olin v. GoehlerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1985
  2. Fleshman v. WhitesideOregon Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Kohout v. BrooksWashington Supreme Court · 1935
  4. M.H.B. Company v. DesmondWashington Supreme Court · 1929
  5. United Cigar Stores Co. v. Florence ShopWashington Supreme Court · 1933

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API