Legal Opinion · Dissent

Gohel v. Allstate Insurance

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided February 20, 2001No. AC 19337Published

1DissentSpear, J.

I would affirm the judgment of the trial court. Our Supreme Court has declared that § 2 (e) of Public Acts 1993, No. 93-77 (P.A. 93-77), does not apply retroactively. Bayusik v. Nationwide Mutual Ins. Co., 233 Conn. 474, 483-85, 659 A.2d 1188 (1995). Relying on Bayusik, we held, in a case similar to this one, that the two year statute of limitations contained in the insurance contract barred the underinsured motorist claim.1 Bilodeau v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., 44 Conn. App. 698, 691 A.2d 1115, cert. granted, 241 Conn. 907, 704 A.2d 795 (1997) (appeal withdrawn December 10, 1997).

In…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Continental Insurance v. Cebe-HaberskySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  2. Bayusik v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  3. Hotkowski v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  4. Dorsey v. United Technologies Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  5. Bilodeau v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API