Legal Opinion
Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of the State of North Dakota v. Stensland
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided June 21, 2011No. 20100304PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SUSPENSION ORDERED.
2Per curiam
[¶ 1] Monty J. Stensland objects to the report of a hearing panel of the Disciplinary Board recommending suspension of his license to practice law, payment of restitution, and payment of costs of the disciplinary proceeding. We conclude there is clear and convincing evidence Stensland violated N.D.R. Prof. Conduct 1.4, 1.5, 1.15, 1.16, and 8.4, and N.D.R. Lawyer Discipl. 1.2(A). We order that Stensland be suspended from the practice of law for one year, pay restitution in the amount of $2,700, and pay costs and expenses of the disciplinary proceeding in the amount of…
3Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. SchmeetsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against AskewNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. BuchholzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
- Disciplinary Board v. KirschnerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- In the Matter of Application for Disciplinary Action Against StenslandNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by11 opinions
- Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of the State of North Dakota v. FelandNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
- Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court v. HannNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
- City of Mandan v. Strata Corp.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
- Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of the State v. DyerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
- Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of the State of North Dakota v. LeeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.