State v. Buchholz

NEUMANN, Justice.

[¶ 1] Robert L. Buchholz appealed from a judgment entered upon a jury verdict finding him guilty of gross sexual imposition. We hold Buchholz waived review of issues about references at trial to other alleged wrongful acts by him, the statute of limitations did not bar the prosecution, the State did not violate a sequestration order, and Buchholz waived his right to receive an adult sexual offender evaluation more than ten days before sentencing. We affirm.

I

[¶ 2] In October 2002, the State charged Buchholz with gross sexual imposition under N.D.C.C. § 12.1-20-03(2), for…