Legal Opinion

EVARD v. Southern California Edison

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 11, 2007No. B184046PublishedCited by 14 opinions

[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KITCHING, J.

I. INTRODUCTION

An employee of an independent contractor sued the owners of a billboard, who hired the independent contractor, for injuries the employee incurred when he fell from, the billboard. The issue in this appeal is whether a billboard safety regulation created a nondelegable duty owed by the billboard owners to the employee, and if it did, whether the owners breached that duty.

Plaintiffs Daniel Evard and Christina Evard, and defendant and cross-complainant Southern California Edison (SCE), appeal from a summary judgment entered for defendants Heywood Outdoor…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Merrill v. Navegar, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Privette v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Kinsman v. Unocal Corp.California Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Finnegan v. Royal Realty Co.California Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Hooker v. Department of TransportationCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. SeaBright Insurance v. US Airways, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Padilla v. Pomona CollegeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  3. Madden v. Summit View, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2008
  4. Khosh v. Staples ConstructionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  5. Vargas v. FMI, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2015

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API