EVARD v. Southern California Edison
California Court of Appeal
[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KITCHING, J.
I. INTRODUCTION
An employee of an independent contractor sued the owners of a billboard, who hired the independent contractor, for injuries the employee incurred when he fell from, the billboard. The issue in this appeal is whether a billboard safety regulation created a nondelegable duty owed by the billboard owners to the employee, and if it did, whether the owners breached that duty.
Plaintiffs Daniel Evard and Christina Evard, and defendant and cross-complainant Southern California Edison (SCE), appeal from a summary judgment entered for defendants Heywood Outdoor…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Merrill v. Navegar, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2001
- Privette v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Kinsman v. Unocal Corp.California Supreme Court · 2005
- Finnegan v. Royal Realty Co.California Supreme Court · 1950
- Hooker v. Department of TransportationCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- SeaBright Insurance v. US Airways, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2011
- Padilla v. Pomona CollegeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Madden v. Summit View, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2008
- Khosh v. Staples ConstructionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Vargas v. FMI, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2015
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.