Legal Opinion

Hooker v. Department of Transportation

California Supreme Court

Decided January 31, 2002No. S091601PublishedCited by 98 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BROWN, J.

This is the latest in a series of cases in which we have considered whether an employee of an independent contractor may sue the hirer of the contractor under tort theories covered in chapter 15 of the Restatement Second of Torts (hereafter Restatement).1 In Privette v. Superior Court (1993) 5 Cal.4th 689 [21 Cal.Rptr.2d 72, 854 P.2d 721] (Privette) *201and Toland v. Sunland Housing Group, Inc. (1998) 18 Cal.4th 253 [74 Cal.Rptr.2d 878, 955 P.2d 504] (Toland), we held that an employee of a contractor may not sue the hirer of the contractor under either of the alternative versions…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Privette v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Green v. SouleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Corsetti v. Stone Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
  4. McDonald v. Shell Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Toland v. Sunland Housing Group, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1998

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by98 opinions

  1. Doe I v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  2. Kinsman v. Unocal Corp.California Supreme Court · 2005
  3. SeaBright Insurance v. US Airways, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Chad S. Gass v. Virgin Islands Telephone Corporation, Raco, Incorporated, and Ann Marie EstesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
  5. McKown v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2002

93 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API