Legal Opinion

Khosh v. Staples Construction

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 26, 2016No. 2d Civil B268937PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTangeman, J.

*714 An employee of an independent contractor generally may not recover tort damages for work-related injuries from the contractor's hirer. ( Privette v. Superior Court (1993) 5 Cal.4th 689 , 702, 21 Cal.Rptr.2d 72 , 854 P.2d 721 ( Privette ).) There are exceptions to this rule but they do not *715 apply here. We decide that the trial court correctly granted a motion for summary judgment against the injured employee when he failed to present evidence that respondent affirmatively contributed to his injuries. As a result, there were no triable issues of material fact on his theory that either the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Yanowitz v. L'OREAL USA, INC.California Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Privette v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Lyle v. Warner Brothers Television ProductionsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Hooker v. Department of TransportationCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Gonzalez v. MathisCalifornia Supreme Court · 2021
  2. Hodges v. Hertz Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2018
  3. Johnson v. Raytheon Co., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  4. Alvarez v. Seaside Transp. Servs. LLC, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  5. Alaniz v. Sun Pacific ShippersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API