SeaBright Insurance v. US Airways, Inc.
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*594Opinion
KENNARD, J.
Generally, when employees of independent contractors are injured in the workplace, they cannot sue the party that hired the contractor to do the work. (Privette v. Superior Court (1993) 5 Cal.4th 689 [21 Cal.Rptr.2d 72, 854 P.2d 721] (Privette).) Here, we consider whether the Privette rule applies when the party that hired the contractor (the hirer) failed to comply with workplace safety requirements concerning the precise subject matter of the contract, and the injury is alleged to have occurred as a consequence of that failure. We hold that the Privette rule does apply in…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Privette v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Van Arsdale v. HollingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Elsner v. UvegesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- Kinsman v. Unocal Corp.California Supreme Court · 2005
- Woolen v. Aerojet General CorporationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Peredia v. HR Mobile Servs., Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Pac. Gas & Elec. Co. v. Superior Court of Sacramento Cnty., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Gonzalez v. MathisCalifornia Supreme Court · 2021
- Tverberg v. Fillner Construction, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2012
- Delgadillo v. Television Ctr., Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.