Legal Opinion

Hill v. Braden

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1876PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Erom the Marion Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Perkins,

Hill and Long, partners in the lumber business, the plaintiffs in this suit, filed in the recorder’s office of Marion county, the following notice of intention to hold a lien, viz.:

“ Indianapolis, Ind., Sept. 22d, 1873.
“ To William Braden and all other persons concerned. You are hereby notified, that E. Van Kuren, whom you employed to erect and construct seven cottages, (more or less,) on lots number four, five, six and seven, Brett, Bra-den & Co.’s addition to city of Indianapolis, Marion county, State of Indiana, as per plat-book No. 1, page 58, is indebted to us in the sum of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Fitzgerald v. ThomasSupreme Court of Missouri · 1876
  2. City of Crawfordsville v. BarrIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  3. Fitzpatrick v. ThomasSupreme Court of Missouri · 1876
  4. Moran v. . ChaseNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  5. James v. HambletonIllinois Supreme Court · 1866

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Kezartee v. Marks & Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Crawford v. CrockettIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  3. City of Crawfordsville v. BrundageIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Midland Railway Co. v. WilcoxIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Wilkerson v. RustIndiana Supreme Court · 1877

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API