Moran v. . Chase
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
The eleven buildings upon which the claimant asserted his lien are contiguous to each other, and, with the land on which they are erected, were, at the time the work was done and the lien filed, all owned by George K. Chase. He is the only appellant, and as against him there can be no good objection to treating them all as one building, and permitting the plaintiffs' claim against all of them to be embraced in a single proceeding.
The referee has found that the work and materials were done and furnished at the request of Chase and under contracts with him. Chase sets up in his answer that…
2Cited by14 opinions
- Lyon & Gribble v. LoganTexas Supreme Court · 1887
- Kenney v. . ApgarNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
- Maryland Brick Co. v. SpilmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1892
- Hill v. BradenIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
- Seeman v. SchultzeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.