Legal Opinion

Midland Railway Co. v. Wilcox

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 16, 1890No. 13,686PublishedCited by 25 opinions

From the Madison Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

Wilcox seeks by his complaint' to foreclose a lien which he asserts he holds by the assignment of part of an estimate, certified to him by the appellant’s engineer, against an unfinished railroad of which the appellant is the owner. Holleran and Ingerman filed a cross-complaint, asserting a lien, and claiming the right to enforce it as the assignees of the persons with whom the construction contract was entered into by the railroad company.

We do not deem it necessary to give a synopsis of the pleadings, for the reason that the special finding contains the material facts, and we can, without a…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. United States v. KirbySupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  2. Chicago City v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1863
  3. Muller v. DowsSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  4. Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. TalbotIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Indiana, Bloomington & Western Railway Co. v. AllenIndiana Supreme Court · 1888

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Moore-Mansfield Construction Co v. Indianapolis, Newcastle & Toledo Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Farmers Loan & Trust Co. v. Canada & St. Louis Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Clark v. HueyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1895
  4. Williams v. Mountaineer Gold Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Fleming v. GreenerIndiana Supreme Court · 1909

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API