Legal Opinion

Burnaman v. Heaton

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 30, 1951No. A-2872PublishedCited by 165 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Smith

This suit was instituted by Mrs. Frances Burnaman against Mrs. Jan Higdon Peabody Heaton and her husband, W. P. Heaton, for damages for personal injuries suffered by plaintiff as the result of a collision between an automobile driven by Mrs. Burnaman and an automobile driven by Mrs. Heaton.

A trial court judgment in favor of respondents was affirmed by the Court of Civil Appeals, 231 S.W. 2d 1006.

For convenience, the parties shall hereafter be referred to as plaintiff and defendants. The original attorneys for the respective parties shall be referred to as attorneys for plaintiff and attorneys…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Preston v. HillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
  2. King v. . KingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  3. Rodriguez v. . RodriguezSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  4. McMillan v. McMillanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
  5. Jacobs v. SteinbrinkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by165 opinions

  1. Adrian Cavallini v. State Farm Mutual Auto Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
  2. Padilla v. LaFranceTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Kennedy v. HydeTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Quintero v. Jim Walter Homes, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Samples Exterminators v. SamplesTexas Supreme Court · 1982

160 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API