Legal Opinion
Jamal v. Travelers Lloyds of Texas Insurance
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided January 26, 2001No. CIV. A. H-99-4369PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
CRONE, United States Magistrate Judge.
Pending before the court is Defendant Travelers Property & Casualty Insurance Company’s (“TPCIC”) Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) and Rule 12(c)(# 28). TPCIC seeks dismissal of Plaintiff Ashraf A. Jamal’s (“Jamal”) extra-contractual, state law claims on the grounds that they are preempted by federal law. Having reviewed the pending motion, the submissions of the parties, the pleadings, and the applicable law, the court is of the opinion that TPCIC’s motion to dismiss should be granted in part and denied in part.
I. Background
2Cases cited56 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Collins v. Morgan Stanley Dean WitterCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
- Federal Crop Ins. Corp. v. MerrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Edgar Allen Gibson and Leslie Gibson v. American Bankers Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- Guyton v. FM LENDING SERVICES, INC.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
- Reeder v. Nationwide Mutual Fire InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2006
- Scritchfield v. Mutual of Omaha InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2004
- Houck v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2002
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.