Scritchfield v. Mutual of Omaha Insurance
District Court, E.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS
CLARK, District Judge.
I.BACKGROUND
Plaintiffs Kirk and Melissa Scritchfield are owners of a Standard Flood Insurance Policy (“SFIP”) issued by Defendants Mutual of Omaha Insurance Co. and Omaha Property and Casualty Insurance Co pursuant to the National Flood Insurance Act, 42 U.S.C. § 4001 et seq (“NFIA”). Their house was flooded on two separate occasions and Defendants paid an amount Plaintiffs claim to be inadequate. Plaintiffs filed a petition in state court claiming breach of contract under 42 U.S.C. § 4072 (2000), and asserting various…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Touche Ross & Co. v. RedingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Glenn Gunter v. Farmers Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
- Moffett v. Computer Sciences Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 2006
- Reeder v. Nationwide Mutual Fire InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2006
- Davis v. Nationwide Mutual Fire InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2011
- Padalino v. Standard Fire InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.