Legal Opinion
Houck v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.
District Court, D. South Carolina
Decided March 18, 2002No. Civ.A. 9:01-3049-23PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DUFFY, District Judge.
This matter is before the court upon Plaintiffs’ Motion to Remand. Defendants oppose this motion. For the following rea sons, Plaintiffs’ Motion to Remand is granted.
I. BACKGROUND
Plaintiffs are homeowners who purchased flood insurance from Defendants. Plaintiffs, individually and on the behalf of those similarly situated, allege that Defendants improperly steered them to purchase flood insurance coverage which was more expensive and in excess of their dis-cernable needs. Plaintiffs originally filed this action in the Beaufort County Court of Common Pleas on June 20,…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Thompson Ex Rel. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Gully v. First Nat. Bank in MeridianSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MottleySupreme Court of the United States · 1908
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Campo v. Allstate InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
- Moffett v. Computer Sciences Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 2006
- Reeder v. Nationwide Mutual Fire InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2006
- Davis v. Nationwide Mutual Fire InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2011
- Waltrip v. Brooks Agency, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2006
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.